Friday, November 2, 2012

Cerebral perceptions


I’ve been thinking a lot lately about types of people. I’m not referring to a certain way of dress or a certain social grouping; I’m talking about those aspects of each of us that make us who we are, that give us a ‘type’. We’ve come up with an array of classifications to help us understand one another. We put each other in small, predictable boxes to try and make sense of interactions, of relationships. Our perceptions of others are based on our own perceptions of the world. Our lens is always egocentric. We can hardly be expected to make sense of ourselves, let alone the people around us.

I think that’s what all relationships are. We find people who share some aspect of ourselves because it gives us something to grasp, some clearer object to hold onto. We cling to that mutualness for as long as it continues to tie us together and isn’t broken by one of those stronger forces of change that make the connection look too fuzzy. Some frayed ropes can be knotted and re-knotted and I think that that is what love is; we continue to be tethered to those few people who make the most sense, or whose foggy spots we are most willing to ignore.  

We warn against those people who seem to change with the crowd, but perhaps those people are the ones least to be pitied. Or the least to be lonely. Those of us who fulfill our roles in every situation are the ones who have the most chance of loss. Our lack of variation means that our connections are fewer, our isolation potentially more widespread. Perhaps those of us who live within the confines of our own heads have the greater capacity to love, but the less possibility of such demonstrations.

Perhaps this is all just my attempt at retying a knot. Of fulfilling my role. Or of foolishly attempting to change it.